Bombing ISIS isn’t working – Stop the War Coalition

Let me be absolutely 100% clear here.  I served in The UK armed forces and will always support those put in harms way by our Government.

The current conflict across the Middle East will not be affected in the slightest by the current bombing campaign by the western coalition.  The British armed forces learned that you cannot win a military victory against terrorists.  Many years of conflict in Northern Ireland was not ended by force of arms.  It was ended by a political solution.  Unfortunately the western coalitions policies in the Middle East simply continue to make things worse.  When I trained as an electronics technician in the Royal Navy the Government of the day was raising money by selling weapons and training to both Iran & Iraq.  I trained alongside sailors from those countries.  A few years later we were fighting them and they were using weapons we sold them and trained them to use against us.  The situation now is hardly any different.  Less than to years ago we were arming supposedly moderate “Freedom Fighters” in Syria in a bid to secure regime change.  Those Freedom Fighters are now called ISIS and we are now bombing them and presumably arming new “moderate “Freedom Fighters” to tackle them.  Remember, one mans Freedom Fighter is another mans terrorist.  At the same time we are allowing the most awful atrocities to be carried out against the Kurdish people and the people of Gaza.  We are rightly outraged when ISIS murder Western hostages and yet we stand idly by whilst ‘friendly’ Arab states (Saudi Arabia) behead its own citizens in public executions for reasonably minor crimes.  We watch as petty thieves have their hands cut off in public spectacles and women are punished for driving cars.

Sadly Western Policy in the Middle East is confused, inconsistent and such a mess that I doubt if it can ever be reconciled.  In the meantime we send our young men and women into no win situations, risking their lives in an ultimately fruitless endeavour.  Does anyone truly believe that the Taliban will not re-emerge in Afghanistan once western withdrawal is complete.

The article below is by Robert Fisk and reproduced from the “Stop the War Coalitions website”.  It gives an in depth analysis of why the bombing campaign is doomed to failure.

IS THERE a “Plan B” in Barack Obama’s brain? Or in David Cameron’s, for that matter? I mean, we’re vaguely told that air strikes against the ferocious “Islamic State” may go on for “a long time”. But how long is “long”?

Are we just going to go on killing Arabs and bombing and bombing and bombing until, well, until we go on bombing? What happens if our Kurdish and non-existent “moderate” Syrian fighters – described by Vice-President Joe Biden last week as largely “shopkeepers” – don’t overthrow the monstrous “Islamic State”? Then I suppose we are going to bomb and bomb and bomb again. As a Lebanese colleague of mine asked in an article last week, what is Obama going to do next? Has he thought of that?

After Alan Henning’s beheading, the gorge rises at the thought of even discussing such things. But distance sometimes creates distorting mirrors, none so more than when it involves the distance between the Middle East and Washington, London, Paris and, I suppose, Canberra.

In Beirut, I’ve been surveying the Arab television and press – and it’s interesting to see the gulf that divides what the Arabs see and hear, and what the West sees and hears.

The gruesome detail is essential here to understand how Arabs have already grown used to jihadi barbarity. They have seen full video clips of the execution of Iraqis – if shot in the back of the head, they have come to realise, a victim’s blood pours from the front of his face – and they have seen video clips of Syrian soldiers not only beheaded but their heads then barbecued and carried through villages on sticks.

Understandably, Alan Henning’s murder didn’t get much coverage in the Middle East, although television did show his murder video – which Western television did not. But it didn’t make many front pages. Mostly the fighting between jihadis and Kurds at Ein al-Arab (Kobane) and the festival for the Muslim Eid – and the Haj in Saudi Arabia – dominated news coverage. In general, the Arab world was as uninterested in Henning’s murder as we have been, for example, in the car bomb that killed 50 Syrian children in Homs last week. Had they been British children, of course…

But I’m struck by friends who’ve asked me why we are really carrying out air strikes when we won’t put soldiers on the ground. They have noted how the families of American hostages – fruitlessly seeking mercy for their loved ones – keep repeating that they cannot make Obama do what they want him to do. Yet, don’t we claim that our democratic governments can be influenced by individuals, that they do what we want?

And watching David Cameron on my Beirut television last week, I asked myself why it was really necessary for the RAF to bomb the “Islamic State”. He knows very well that our four – or is it two? – clapped-out Tornadoes are not going to make the slightest difference to any assault on jihadi forces. Indeed, he was prepared to delay RAF strikes until the Scottish referendum was over. If so, why did he not defer them altogether to save British lives?

But it was obvious at the Tory party conference that Cameron’s greatest threat came not from a man in Mosul called Abu-Bakr al-Baghdadi, but from a man in Bromley called Nigel Farage. Thus he waffled on about how Britain would “hunt down and bring to justice” Henning’s killers and do “everything we can to defeat this organisation in the region and at home”, using “all the assets we have to find these [remaining] hostages”. By “all the assets”, he must mean ground troops – because the RAF is already being used – and this we are not, I think, going to do. “British troops held hostage by Islamic State” is not a headline he wants to read. Thus I fear we are going to do nothing except bomb. And bomb. And bomb. Farage can’t beat that.

Like all Western leaders faced with a crisis in the Middle East, Cameron does not want to deal with it – or explore why it happened. He wants to know how to respond to it politically or, preferably, militarily. Our refusal to broadcast the “Islamic State” beheading videos is understandable – absolutely in the case of the actual murders – but by preventing Brits from actually seeing these horrors, the Government avoids having to respond to the public’s reaction: either a call for more air strikes or to demand their annulment.

This secrecy means the hostages do not exist in our imagination; they only emerge from the mist into the horrible desert sunlight when that grisly video arrives. In the region itself, hostages become public property at once, relatives giving interviews and demanding action from their governments. As I write, the families of 21 captured Lebanese soldiers faced with beheading are blocking the main Damascus- Beirut highway. A Qatari envoy has arrived to help (presumably with lots of cash).

Perhaps we need to reframe our understanding of the “Islamic State”. British Muslim leaders have said, quite rightly, that Muslims show mercy, and that the “Islamic State” is a perversion of Islam. I suspect and fear that they are wrong. Not because Islam is not merciful, but because the “Islamic State” has nothing at all to do with Islam. It is more a cult of nihilism. Their fighters have been brutalised – remember that they have endured, many of them, Saddam’s cruelty, our sanctions, Western invasion and occupation and air strikes under Saddam and now air strikes again. These people just don’t believe in justice any more. They have erased it from their minds.

If we had not supported so many brutal men in the Middle East, would things have turned out differently? Probably. If we had supported justice – I hesitate to suggest putting a certain man on trial for war crimes – would there have been a different reaction in the Middle East? In the Syrian war, they say that 200,000 have died; in Gaza more than 2,000. But in Iraq, we suspect half a million died. And whose fault was that?

The “Islamic State” are the real or spiritual children of all this. Now we face an exclusive form of nihilism, a cult as merciless as it is morbid. And we bomb and we bomb and we bomb. And then?

via Bomb, bomb, bomb ISIS isn’t working, but does Obama have a Plan B in his brain? – Stop the War Coalition.

9 thoughts on “Bombing ISIS isn’t working – Stop the War Coalition

  1. elasticexile

    I think you are right that there’s a risk that we’ll being dragged into another conflict that is fraught with underhand diplomacy and hypocrisy. For example, we wouldn’t ever antagonise Saudi despite their frequent beheadings because we supply them with arms.
    Hope you don’t mind but I’ve reblogged this on my journalism blog, Byline.


  2. lulu

    Obviously you have strong feelings about the current disruptive situations and have given them much thought. Many share your concern but have no answer. Apparently neither do our leaders.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The Sound of Summer Post author

      Lulu, I think what worries me most about the whole situation is that there do not seem to be any answers to this mess. I don’t know what we can do to make the situation better. I truly am at a loss. In some way I feel sorry for the current crop of politicians as in the main they have inherited this mess. The murder of innocents by Isis and others is hideous and it would be difficult for our leaders to be seen to do nothing. The only thing that I am certain of is that the current approach to the situation makes it worse, not better. The best way to ensure that the terrorist groups have a steady stream of recruits is to continue as we are. I feel very hopeless about the whole situation.


  3. Pingback: Bombing ISIS isn't working - Stop the War Coalition

    1. The Sound of Summer Post author

      Jenny, it is indeed very scary. I see this morning that Turkey is now trying to push the coalition into committing ground troops and toppling the Assad regime in Syria. There is no doubt that we are being drawn into yet another war in the region.

      I am worried about what we are not being told by our leaders. ISIS did not just spring up overnight. This is a group that has control of about 40,000 sq km (15,000 sq miles) of Iraq and Syria – roughly the size of Belgium. Others believe they control closer to 90,000 sq km (35,000 sq miles) – about the size of Jordan. That territory includes cities – Mosul, Tikrit, Falluja and Tal Afar in Iraq; Raqqa in Syria – oil fields, dams, main roads and border crossings. Eight million people are believed to be living under partial or full IS control. They are well armed and well lead. I have seen reports suggesting that they are better armed than the armies facing them.

      This is no ragged band of militants. It is high time that our leaders started to tell us the truth.


      1. jenny

        Yes, it is indeed time for some transparency. The prospect of being pulled into another war, blind-folded, is a worrying prospect. Although none of the options look rosy from where I’m sitting.

        Liked by 1 person

Sing out here if you want to be heard!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s