Tag Archives: Middle East

Je Suis Charlie

Charlie Hebdo: I Am Not Charlie And I Make No Apology For That

Earlier this week I sat horrified and appalled by the events that took place in Paris.  The barbaric murder of journalists, Police Officers and innocent bystanders cannot be excused by any sane and rational person and I most certainly do not intend to offer any excuses for the perpetrators of these truly horrific murders.

Today sees a million people come together in Paris in a show of ‘solidarity’, and over the past few days we have seen the hashtag #jesuischarlie go viral in a social media campaign that “Stands up for free speech.”  Politicians around the globe have rightly condemned the attacks and many have made their way to Paris today to support the protests against the killings.  Against this backdrop I and no doubt millions of people around the world are wondering where attacks of this nature leave us.

It isn’t difficult to come up with a huge list of atrocities that have been committed in recent times in the name of Islam.  9/11, 7/7, Peshawar, Madrid,  the list goes on and on.  The rise of Islamic State, the battle for Kobane, the rise of Boko Haram, the kidnap of 276 Schoolgirls, the slaughter of over 2000 people in Baga, Nigeria this week all issues that have us scratching our heads and wondering what to do to combat the threat posed by Islamist terrorism.

We hear much about the ‘War on Terror’ and just today we hear world leaders saying that we must step up our efforts in that direction.  We in the UK today have also heard that more funding must be directed to our secret ‘security services’ and that those organisations must be given still greater powers to spy on their own citizens.  I find this ever increasing erosion of my civil liberties deeply concerning.  I know for a fact that we have Police Officers trained to pick locks to gain access to suspects homes to place listening devices and spy camera’s, I know that tracking devices are attached to suspects cars.  I know that mobile and landline telephones are regularly listened to by Police.  I accept that the Police have to have a warrant before they can place these devices but if this is what is happening in Policing, how much more surveillance are  people subjected to by the secret security services.  As our civil rights are eroded as a response to the ‘War On Terror’ how much freedom will we have to give up in the name of security.  How far do we trust those who spy on us to use the information lawfully and reasonably?  I can only say that after some 29 years as a Police Officer I have no faith that the agents of state will act reasonably.  None!

Getting back to Je Suis Charlie, let me say that I am delighted to see so many turn out to support the families of those who were murdered.  I believe that response is right and proper and it may even provide a crumb of comfort to the families.  What I am less comfortable with is the groundswell that this in some way protects free speech.  I wonder!  Charlie Hebdo is portrayed as a satirical magazine.  Now as I understand it the magazine has attacked Islam, Judaism, the Catholic Church and just about everyone else in recent years.  I accept that as fact without argument.  I saw the argument put forward very forcefully today that this was OK because it attacked everyone equally.  This where my support evaporates.  This magazine has been Racist, Sexist, Anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, Anti-Catholic and insulting to just about  every race or creed.  The question I have to grapple with is this.  Is it acceptable to insult peoples beliefs so long as you insult everyone’s?  Not in my view, that sort of thinking is just bonkers in my opinion.

Of course being rude and insulting people or religion should not carry a death sentence.  It does however mean that I don’t want to be Charlie, thank you very much.  I have had more than enough religious hatred in my life growing up in N. Ireland.  It may be a cliche but hate breeds hate.

Je Suis Charlie

The thing that has been totally absent in the past few days is any meaningful analysis of the root causes of these atrocities.  It seems clear that for some reason young Muslim men, and increasingly young women and children, are all too easily radicalised.  What on earth induces a 10 year old child to strap a bomb to herself and to explode it in a market place killing herself and at least 19 others in Nigeria yesterday.  Perhaps Ironically this incident and the atrocity in Baga, Nigeria where over 2000 have been slaughtered by Boko Haram this week are almost totally unreported in the mainstream media.  This lack of coverage leads me to ponder why the murder of 17 people is more newsworthy than the murder of over 2000.  Is it because it place in Nigeria and the area is deemed too dangerous for journalists, is it because we find it so difficult and sensational that gunmen can walk into an office in a major European city and murder indiscriminately?  Is it because it is closer to home and that journalists see the murder of their colleagues as more important.  I genuinely have no idea.

Image: TOPSHOTS-FRANCE-ATTACKS-CHARLIE-HEBDO-SHOOTING

What does seem clear to me however is the elephant in the room.  That elephant is U.S., Nato & European policy in the Middle East.  There can be little doubt that the implementation of the ‘agreement’ of the formation of the state of Israel and western support for the jewish state caused a huge amount of resentment in many of the Arab States, there have been wars and conflict in the region ever since.  The unrest and radicalisation however seems to have accelerated significantly since the first Gulf War in 1990.  Since that time the terrorism has become the weapon of choice in the region.

Lets be clear, terrorism is the weapon of the weak, particularly of the weak who feel oppressed and aggrieved by stronger oppressors.  The first Gulf war was ostensibly prosecuted to liberate Kuwait after it was invaded by the larger and more powerful Iraq.  The liberation of Kuwait was undoubtably one of the primary objectives but it is widely accepted that Iraq’s actions could not be tolerated because it threatened the west’s oil interests.  Our reliance on oil meant that any action that threatened access to this increasingly rare resource could not be countenanced.  Ever since 1990 our policies in the region have become increasingly confusing with support for regimes seemingly changing on a whim.

What is absolutely beyond a shred of doubt is that the war on terror has cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East and that the overwhelming majority of those killed are Muslim’s.  It seems to me that the killing of Muslims by Muslims or by coalition forces is either under-reported or not reported at all.  The Stop the War coalition reports on these issues today saying

“The same people responsible for the attacks in Paris are also responsible for much worse attacks on their fellow Muslims in countries like Yemen or Libya. Last week 37 police recruits were killed in a bomb at an academy near near Yemen’s capital city Sanaa, and dozens more injured.”

“Many people hearing about so-called western values ‘freedom’, ‘truth’ and ‘equality’ — now made so much of, following the Charlie Hebdo slaughter — will wonder what values it was that allowed Israel last Summer to bomb Gaza, causing the deaths of thousands of Palestinians. They will wonder about the torture by US forces at Abu Ghraib (cited as one reason for the ‘radicalisation’ of one of the Charlie Hebdo murderers). They will wonder about Guantanamo, extraordinary rendition, torture, and the other consequences of the war on terror that have caused such misery.”

“They must also wonder at the myopia which allows the absolutely correct condemnation of terrorist attacks in France but which seems to regard western bombings, drone attacks and the killing of civilians in occupied countries, as necessary if slightly distasteful activities, justified because they are carried out by nation states, rather than lone individuals.”

The sad fact is that terrorism is bred by oppression.  The oppressed can only attack nation states in a limited way such as we saw in Paris this week.  Charlie Hebdo may have been attacked because of their depiction of the prophet but the willingness of individuals to commit mass murder in this way is driven by something much deeper and much more difficult to understand and resolve.

I fear that the attacks in Paris will serve to stir up more anti Islamic feeling not only in France, where there have been numerous attacks on Muslims since the murders, but also in the UK.  I am certain we will see Nigel Farage and UKIP step up the anti-immigration rhetoric as we move closer to the forthcoming General Election.  We have already seen fascist group ‘Britain First’ step up their racist attacks.

As our political leaders gather in Paris today, along with the millions around the world, to mourn those so brutally murdered, I hope they will take a moment to reflect on how we have come to be where we are.  Our leaders have supported war after war in the middle east since 1990.  Rather than recognising that our reliance on oil puts us in an increasingly vulnerable position and instigating measures to reduce that reliance we seem more than willing to fight wars over what remains.  Reliance on oil cannot continue for ever, it is a finite resource.  Fighting over the last few drops will lead only to further conflict and more killing.

Those same leaders have to recognise that the ‘War on terror’ is a war that cannot be won militarily.  There is no military solution, as the British Army found out in Northern Ireland, you cannot fight an enemy that you cannot see.  Eventually attacks of the kind we saw this week erodes the will to fight and it must be acknowledged that Muslim Terrorists are often much more ruthless that The IRA.  The IRA wanted to walk away from their attacks, the radical Jihadist terrorist is not only prepared to die bringing terror they seem to welcome ‘martyrdom’ with open arms.

In conclusion I will return to my original point about Je Suis Charlie.  I fear that this has little to do with ‘freedom of speech’.  I fear that the solidarity expressed will lead to further demonisation of Muslims and even worse it presents the conditions for an anti-muslim backlash in Europe, something likely to cause yet more radicalisation.  The biggest tribute that could be paid to those who died this week would be for our leaders to begin the process of addressing the root causes that underly Islamic extremism.  For them to begin the process of finding a political solution that sees a fair settlement for all and that removes the sense of injustice and powerlessness that breeds terrorism.  Where that to happen I could then stand proudly and say Je Suis Charlie.

(AP Photo/Thibault Camus)

Advertisements

That Friday Feeling – Mrs Potters Lullaby

That Friday feeling is a place to share something with the world.  It could be a song, a poem, a painting or a photograph, anything at all.  There is but one rule.  Whatever it is must touch you on an emotional level.

Either drop me a note with a link and I will post here or leave a comment with a ping back to your own blog.  Join in and share that Friday feeling 🙂

This week’s tune is Mrs Potters Lullaby by the Brilliant Counting Crows.  This time tomorrow I will be on my way to Birmingham to see them for the first night of their UK tour.  Yahoo!  This fulfils a long held ambition as they are a band I have wanted to see for many years 🙂  I will be seeing them again next week too 🙂

 

British Troops withdraw from Afghanistan

Monday the 27th October 2014.  At last the day the last British troops have left Afghanistan.

I have repeatedly voiced my opposition to our involvement in the conflicts in the region.  In my view our involvement has been counterproductive.  We have seen young men across the Middle East and even at home become more radicalised.  Arguably the region is less stable than when we began and it is thought by many that we are less safe at home than before the invasion.

It has been conceded that the Taliban are still in control of large areas of the country, Afghanistan now exports more heroine now than it did in 2001.  The conflict has cost a huge amount in both lives and money.

It has always been my view that the invasion of Afghanistan was illegal and immoral.  It is estimated that at least 20,000 Afghan civilians have died during the conflict and I would dearly love to see both Tony Blair and George W. Bush stand trial for war crimes.

Having said all of that I salute every member of our armed services who served in that region.  I salute the 453 British Service personnel who paid the ultimate price.  I salute the thousands of armed forces personnel who have been wounded and maimed and I salute the families of our service personnel who have had to come to terms with loved ones serving in the region.

I salute the bravery, sacrifice and fortitude of each and every person affected by this conflict.

At the going down of the sun and in the morning, we will remember them!!

The UK needs more radicals! Here is why?

On Wednesday 22nd October 2014 I was watching the BBC evening news when my heart hit the floor.  The Reason?    The leader of the UK’s labour party Ed Miliband had made a speech in which he promised that he will introduce an immigration reform bill within a month of winning the next election that offers “clear, credible and concrete” measures to deal with the ‘concerns of voters’

Miliband said Labour’s policy would strengthen our borders, restricting recruitment from abroad and ensuring immigrants could speak a good standard of English.  He went on to say that he did not want the UK to withdraw from the European Union but that he did want additional restrictions placed on EU migrants into Britain.  So why should I be concerned about this?

This ‘policy initiative’ by Miliband is his response to tough talking by the Conservative party and by (UKIP) the United Kingdom Independence Party and, sadly, it marks yet another lurch to the right by the supposedly ‘socialist’ Labour Party.  This is just the latest move to the right in a seemingly inexorable shift to the right over the past 35 years.  Between the end of World War 2 and Margaret Thatchers rise to power in 1979 successive UK governments of all parties were strongly rooted in a Social Democratic mixed economy model.  Universal health care, Nationalisation of monopolies, social welfare and social housing.  These policies helped the UK to its post war recovery and to the longest period of stable economic growth in our history.  Even conservative Prime Ministers during this period were to the left of the political centre.

When Thatcher came to power she set about ‘rolling back the state’ and even went so far as to claim that ‘There is no such thing as society’.  Thatchers Neoliberal economic model was strongly resisted by the unions but she set about destroying the power of the unions by breaking strikes, restricting the rights of assembly by pickets and, because she had such a huge majority, she was able to pass legislation banning ‘closed shops’, and restricting the influence of the unions.  This brought the unions to their knees and enabled Thatcher to set about dismantling the huge traditional industries that hitherto had provided full employment in the UK.  These industries were unsurprisingly the bedrock of labour support and based primarily in the industrial heartlands of the North of England, Wales and Scotland.  One by one the great British industries of mining, shipbuilding, steel, car making, textiles and manufacturing were broken up in favour of what Thatcher described as a ‘service economy’.  This model was adopted by the USA in 1981 when Thatchers great friend Reagan came to power.

Unfortunately for the Labour party this came at a time when the party tore itself apart with political infighting which made it virtually unelectable.  As a result ‘Thatcherism, aided by the right wing and ‘Murdoch’ press empires had 18 years to become embedded into the national psyche.

In order to challenge the Conservative party in the 1997 election (after 18 years of conservative rule) ‘New Labour’ was born under the leadership of Tony Blair.  To challenge the Conservatives,  New Labour adopted the economic policies of the Conservatives, a position unthinkable a few years before and far to the right of any UK Government before 1979.

Lets reflect for a moment on ‘Socialism’.  It is generally agreed that Socialism is a social and economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy.  “Social ownership” may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.  The ‘New Labour’ model failed to meet any of these criteria.  Instead their economic policies continued an inexorable move to the right.  To give just a few examples they:

  • Failed to renationalise the rail industry despite an election manifesto pledge to do so.
  • Deregulating the financial sector and abandoning state control of the Bank of England.  These policies were undoubtably responsible for the numerous misselling, rate fixing and toxic debt scandals that lead to the 2008 financial collapse.
  • refusal to renationalise or even regulate the power and water utilities
  • Use of private Finance Initiatives for public sector building schemes that allowed private investors to lock public sector industries into hugely expensive projects that gave no ownership or security of tenure at the end of the contract.  This has built up an estimated £250 billion ‘black hole’ in the future public purse.
  • Refusal to build new public sector housing and continuing to sell off the public housing stock at discounts of up to 80%
  • The introduction of privatisation into the health and education sectors.
  • Failing to tackle tax dodging by the Super rich and by multi-national corporations.

These are just a few of the policies that would have been unthinkable even by Conservative Governments prior to 1979.  Ed Miliband defeated his brother David in a closely fought leadership election in 2010 after Gordon Browns resignation in the wake of failing to win the 2010 election.  Ironically it was the union block vote that carried him to victory in that leadership race.  Ironic because he almost immediately set about further restricting the power of the unions to influence Labour Party policy.

Since Miliband became leader of the labour party he has been smeared by the right who pushed stories about his fathers marxist past into the press in an effort to undermine his ‘credibility’.  Despite the fact that the majority of the British public want to see the rail network and the energy companies renationalised and the vast majority of Labour voters want to see the NHS, the railways, the Royal Mail and the utilities companies renationlised and run as not-for-profit public services.  Despite these facts Miliband has repeatedly ruled out any denationalisation instead saying that he will ‘cap the energy companies’ for a period of time if he wins next years election.  Miliband has even failed to condemn the Conservative ‘workfare’ scheme that forces the long term unemployed into mandatory unpaid labour.  At one time we would have called this slavery.

So where does this leave the UK?  Well the two main parties are clearly far to the right of centre and  the Liberal Democrats, whilst more moderate, are still slightly to the right of centre.   Unfortunately for the Liberal Democrats entering into coalition with the Conservatives has done them irreparable harm.   their support has evaporated and in most of the recent by-elections they have been pushed into fourth place behind the two main parties and UKIP.

Worryingly UKIP has just won its first parliamentary seat and came frighteningly close to a second in what had hitherto been a safe Labour seat in Heywood and Middleton.  Whilst the Labour vote held up the support for other parties switched to UKIP who came within 600 votes of taking the seat.  Unsurprisingly these results have terrified both the main parties with a general election just 7 months away.  In the weeks since those elections we have seen the anti-immigration rhetoric ramped up by both the main parties.

Prime Minister David Cameron continues to state that he will win reforms from the EU before a referendum on Britains membership in 2017.  Our news media continues to feed us a diet of anti-EU rhetoric.  Stories that blame the EU for the Human Rights Act for our inability to expel terrorist suspects and asylum seekers from the UK.  There is an inexorable growth in the numbers of asylum seekers housed for years in ‘detention centres’ whilst their case is processed.  Increases in immigration are falsely blamed on asylum seekers who are often fleeing persecution in their Countries of origin often as a result of unrest caused by our interventions in those countries.  The reality of course is that the numbers seeking asylum in the UK is minuscule when compared with the 100’s of millions of EU citizens who are entitled to live and work in the UK should they so desire.  Of course in true Conservative style Cameron also announced that anyone who has over £5 million in the bank can move to the UK and be fast tracked for a British passport.  As always one rule for the rich and one for the poor.

So whilst UKIP has a stated aim to take the UK out of the EU and have the most right wing views on immigration it seems that the main parties are so worried about UKIP splitting their vote in marginal seats that they are falling over themselves to come up with ‘populist’ policies that are more extreme than those of the extremists.  This has the net effect of moving the UK political establishment still further to the right.

The rightward shift is further illustrated by the continued mess that is UK & US foreign policy in the Middle East.  During the 1960’s and 70’s there was mass immigration into the UK from the Middle East, India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.  Since the first Gulf war in 1990 there has been a dramatic increase in Islamaphobia.  This has increased dramatically and perhaps unsurprisingly since the commencement of the ‘War on Terror’ in the wake of the horrific attacks on 9/11.  Since then Western policy has been engaged in a futile exercise to distinguish between ‘good Muslims’ and ‘bad Muslims’.  By this I mean that the USA lead coalition has waged war in the Middle East to either directly or indirectly overthrow regimes ‘we’ do not like.  I posted a tongue in cheek article from the ‘stop the war coalition’ explaining this a while back.  It is well worth the read if you haven’t seen it.

Sadly in both the USA and the UK Welfare is being cut back, the poor are becoming poorer whilst the rich get richer.  It seems that whilst we cannot afford to look after the most vulnerable in our societies we can afford the weapons to kill many thousands of innocent people in the Middle East.  It is estimated that the cost of the war on terror (dependant on which measure is used) to the USA is likely to be around $6 Trillion or around 1/3 of the US national debt.  The cost to the UK to date is more difficult to quantify but it is estimated that around £40 Billion has been spent in Afghanistan.  This at a time when support for public services are being cut and when PM Cameron has reportedly done a multi Billion pound behind the scenes deal with President Obama for a replacement for trident so that the UK can maintain an ‘independent nuclear deterrent.

It is estimated that the cost to the UK economy of tax avoidance by the super rich and by Multi-National Corporations runs to some £120 Billion a year.  If all of that tax was collected it would put the UK into a budget surplus and allow us to pay down the national debt that now stands at around £1400 Billion.  Rather than tackle tax avoidance we choose to  demonise the needy labelling them social security scroungers and so on.  The Government lead us to believe that the work shy are a huge drain on the public purse.  What they do not tell you is that around 50% of the welfare bill is spent on old age pensions only 3% is spent on jobseekers allowance and a further 2% on Employment support allowance.  The majority of the remainder goes in disability and benefits for low paid working people.

It was interesting to see that just yesterday the UK Office for National Statistics reported that economic growth in the UK is running at 0.7%.  This despite the fact that we are constantly being told what a great job the current Government have done in ‘fixing’ the economy is 0.3% lower than it was when the Government took office in 2010.  The Chancellor, George Osborne, has massively increased the National Debt, borrowing more money in 4 years than every Labour chancellor in history combined.

So where does this leave us.  There can be no doubt, given the global financial collapse in 2008, that Thatchers Neo Liberal economic model is just as much a failure as totalitarian communism was in Eastern Europe.  In my view it takes us to a position where we desperately need the UK to be more radical.  We need a radical left of centre political party who will do some or all of the following:

  • Recognise that the UK is no longer a global superpower, we must stop trying to act like one by taking a colonial attitude towards the Middle East and Africa.  We must stop aligning ourselves with the USA and acting like the worlds policeman (or the school bully).
  • We should scrap trident and forget about replacing it
  • We should aggressively pursue those who fail to pay their taxes
  • If necessary we should either nationalise or more strictly regulate essential services to ensure that people receive a good service at a fair price.
  • We must make determined moves to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels
  • We must make a concerted effort to develop and utilise alternate energy sources
  • We should abolish the unelected ‘House of Lords’.
  • We should reduce the influence of Multi National corporations in our political system by stopping our elected representatives holding directorships in those same companies
  • More power should be devolved away from Westminster to Scotland, Wales, N. Ireland and the English regions.
  • We must implement a form of Government that works to the benefit of all of the citizens of the UK.  A move away from Government by the rich for the rich is essential.
  • There must be less political interference in policing.  We are seeing examples at present of where legitimate public process is being quashed by the police on the orders of the Home Secretary.
  • mechanisms should be put in place to ensure that our members of parliament vote according to the wishes of the people they represent rather than according to how the party whips tell them to vote.
  • measures must be put in place to reduce or eliminate the costs of University Education to help improve social mobility.

I could continue to write thousands more words on these subjects but I am sure you have the idea by now.  In short the UK needs a new radicalisation of its political system, a move back to a form of democracy that better represents the interests of the many rather than the few.  We need a balanced mixed economy, we need to stop the seemingly inexorable shift to the right wing of the political spectrum.

That Friday Feeling – Suspect Device

That Friday feeling is a place to share something with the world.  It could be a song, a poem, a painting or a photograph, anything at all.  There is but one rule.  Whatever it is must touch you on an emotional level.

Either drop me a note with a link and I will post here or leave a comment with a ping back to your own blog.  Join in and share that Friday feeling 🙂

This week I am sharing a song by my all-time favourite band and from an album that undoubtably changed my life and the way I think.  Suspect device by Stiff Little Fingers

Yes it’s true, the United States really is the greatest country in the world – but in what? – Stop the War Coalition

Wow, I just came across this article and thought it worth sharing.  I think it throws up some really interesting issues.  Check it out and let me know what you think. Yes it’s true, the United States really is the greatest country in the world – but in what? – Stop the War Coalition.

AMERICAN politicians are fond of telling their audiences that the United States is the greatest country in the world. Is there any evidence for this claim?

Well, yes. When it comes to violence and preparations for violence, the United States is, indeed, No. 1.

In 2013, according to a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the U.S. government accounted for 37 percent of world military expenditures, putting it far ahead of all other nations. (The two closest competitors, China and Russia, accounted for 11 percent and 5 percent respectively.)

From 2004 to 2013, the United States was also the No. 1 weapons exporter in the world. Moreover, given the U.S. government’s almost continuous series of wars and acts of military intervention since 1941, it seems likely that it surpasses all rivals when it comes to international violence.

This record is paralleled on the domestic front, where the United States has more guns and gun-related deaths than any other country.

study released in late 2013 reported that the United States had 88 guns for every 100 people, and 40 gun-related deaths for every 400,000 people―the most of any of the 27 economically developed countries surveyed. By contrast, in Britain there were 6 guns per 100 people and 1 gun-related death per 400,000 people.

Yet, in a great many other areas, the United States is not No. 1 at all.

Take education.

In late 2013, the Program for International Student Assessment released a report on how 15-year old students from 65 nations performed on its tests. The report showed that U.S. students ranked 17th in reading and 21st in math. An international survey a bit earlier that year by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development found that the ranking was slightly worse for American adults. In 2014, Pearson, a multinational educational services company, placed the United States 20th in the world in “educational attainment”―well behind Poland and the Slovak Republic.

American healthcare and health fare even worse.

In a 2014 study of healthcare (including infant mortality, healthy life expectancy, and mortality from preventable conditions) in 11 advanced industrial countries, the Commonwealth Fund concluded that the United States ranked last among them. According to the World Health Organization, the U.S. healthcare system ranks 30th in the world.

Other studies reach somewhat different conclusions, but all are very unflattering to the United States, as are studies of American health. The United States, for example, has one of the world’s worst cancer rates (the seventh highest), and life expectancy is declining compared to other nations.

An article in the Washington Post in late 2013 reported that the United States ranked 26th among nations in life expectancy, and that the average American lifespan had fallen a year behind the international average.

What about the environment? Specialists at Yale University have developed a highly sophisticated Environmental Performance Index to examine the behavior of nations. In the area of protection of human health from environmental harm, their 2014 index placed the United States 35th in health impacts, 36th in water and sanitation, and 38th in air quality. In the other area studied―protection of ecosystems―the United States ranked 32nd in water resources, 49th in climate and energy, 86th in biodiversity and habitat, 96th in fisheries, 107th in forests, and 109th in agriculture.

These and other areas of interest are dealt with by the Social Progress Index, which was developed by Michael Porter, an eminent professor of business (and a Republican) at Harvard. According to Porter and his team, in 2014 the United States ranked 23rd in access to information and communications, 24th in nutrition and basic medical care, 31st in personal safety, 34th in water and sanitation, 39th in access to basic knowledge, 69th in ecosystem sustainability, and 70th in health and wellness.

The widespread extent of poverty, especially among children, remains a disgrace in one of the world’s wealthiest nations. A 2013 report by the United Nations Children’s Fund noted that, of the 35 economically advanced countries that had been studied, only Rumania had a higher percentage of children living in poverty than did the United States.

Of course, the United States is not locked into these dismal rankings and the sad situation they reveal about the health, education, and welfare of its citizens. It could do much better if its vast wealth, resources, and technology were employed differently than they are at present.

Ultimately, it’s a matter of priorities. When most U.S. government discretionary spending goes for war and preparations for war, it should come as no surprise that the United States emerges No. 1 among nations in its capacity for violence and falls far behind other nations in providing for the well-being of its people.

Americans might want to keep this in mind as their nation embarks upon yet another costly military crusade.

When commenting on WordPress is a bad idea!

I came across a really interesting  and useful piece of advice today.  Unfortunately for me it came about 18 hours too late!  The advice came in the form of a post from Opinionated Man.  The advice “Your audience is not your friend”.

I have been writing this blog for a few months now and for the most part it has been a really positive experience.  I am getting a reasonable number of hits on my site and the numbers of people commenting and following my blog is slowly growing. I have just followed the Writing 101 and Blogging 101 courses as I firmly believe that you can always learn something new and there was always the chance that I would gain a bit of inspiration.  As these courses drew to a close we were encouraged to reach out to other bloggers to help build our networks.

In my reader I searched for topics that interested me and hit upon a post criticising Western Governments for committing funds to rebuild Gaza after what was described as Israel’s ‘Defensive War against Hamas’.  Now most commentators worldwide have roundly condemned Israel’s recent actions and I made what I thought was a balanced and measured comment on the blog. I should have looked a little more deeply before commenting and admittedly I should have known better.  The writer you see identifies themselves as an Israeli activist and the tone of the posts made it unlikely in the extreme that the writer would engage in a conversation that disagreed in any way with the posters views.  As a result I was subjected to a torrent of thinly veiled abuse, accused of being anti-semitic and ill educated.

This was my first negative experience with a member of the WordPress community.  It’s not something I want to repeat :/  I most certainly echo Opinionated Man’s advice.  You should of course reach out to other bloggers, but do check the tone of a blog before commenting on subjects that are controversial and likely to provoke strong reactions. If in doubt either do not comment or be prepared for a bad reaction.

On WordPress as in life you live and learn 🙂